Frederick Winslow Taylor: The Father of Scientific Management :: Frederick Taylor Management Labor Essays

Frederick Winslow Taylor The Father of Scientific Management IntroductionThis paper is in chemical reaction to the assignment for a paper and short speechconcerning a person with relevant contributions to the world of solicitude.Frederick Taylor is affectionately referred to as the Father of ScientificManagement. The modern systems of manufacturing and management would not bethe examples of efficiency that they are today, without the give of Taylor.Frederick Taylor was instrumental in bringing industry out of the dark ages bybeginning to revolutionize the vogue work was approached. Taylor was able toincrease wages, productivity and reduce per piece costs at the same time.Taylors work was eventually adopted in a replete(p) array of applications. Taylorsideas had a significant influence on the industrial life of all modernizedcountries. Even Lenin went as far as to publish an clause in Pravda , Raisingthe Productivity of Labour, based on the writings of Taylor. Thus Taylorchanged the way the world conducted business. Taylors work was an extensionof technology. It was a marriage of human work and technology. His Priniciplesof Scientifiic Management was conceived to be free of value judgement.The Younger YearsFrederick W. Taylor was born into a hale-to-do family in Philadelphia in1856 . His family was not wealthy , but they were nearly exposed to the highculture of the local society. Growing up it was expected that Taylor wouldstudy to become an attorney. Taylor aided Phillips-Exeter Academy. He was adevout student, doing very well with his studies. To achieve good grades,Taylor studied many long hours. It was quite unfortunate that Taylor was tomiss Harvard Law School due to bad eyes that doctors attrributed to studying inthe poor light of a kerosene lamp. In later years it was realized that his eyeproblem was actually caused by stress, as it improved later he left Phillips.Taylor moved back home after graduating from Phillips. He realized that heshould take up a trade and got a transmission line as an apprentice machinist and patternmaker. Having spent four years learning his trade, Taylor got a job as a yardlaborer at Midvale Steel Company.Taylor realized that at this point he needed to continue his education.He convinced the people at Stevens Institute of Technology to allow him toattend classes long distance. He would study in his spare time in Philadelphiaand go to the school in New Jersey to take his exams. In June of 1883, Taylor graduated with a Mechanical Engineering degree. He subsequently joined theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).

In Favor of Class Size Amendment in Florida :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

In Favor of Class Size Amendment in FloridaMerely glimpsing into a smattering of the classrooms that scatter the state should signal that we have a blatant problem with too many students. With an average of 23 students per teacher from kindergarten to fifth grade and a staggering average of almost 28 per teacher in high schools, one might wonder exactly how any young person tummy obtain a comprehensive education. The correlations between classroom sizes and school grades around the state clearly depict the problem at hand from 2003 to 2004 the number of weakness schools increased from 35 to a grand total of 49 schools, according to the Florida Department of Education. Although the incline of fourteen failing schools may not stupefy the masses, the advance alone should warn officials that it is not only our students who are failing, but our current method of handling them as well. To solve this problem, in November of 2002, Floridas voters passed Constitutional Amendment 9, which limits class sizes in Floridas public schools. The established limits are 18 students in prekindergarten through with(predicate) grade three, 22 students in grades four through eight, and 25 students in grades nine through twelve. Although it may seem to be a rather straightforward problem to solve, according to Governor Jeb Bush, it is quite the opposite. Specifically, he is overly worried about the price-tag associated with this class-size amendment. Obviously, greatly increasing the number of classrooms statewide does not transpire with little effort or funding, but this alone does not justify Bushs persistent effort to brush aside the idea of Floridian students being able to obtain a more comfortable and extensive education. So, why exactly should decreasing class sizes be held with achievement importance regardless of the costly efforts required to put this plan into action?